I’d long wondered what Martin Scorsese’s fascination with Italian-American
gangsters was. Why had he dedicated so much of his career to telling the mostly
true stories of some of the most violent, corrupt, heinous people in American
history? I’ve long admired Scorsese’s skill and ability to finesse a caustic examination
of these titans of violence. He draws you in, managing to entice the viewer
into the world, presenting it like a grand opportunity for success. Then he
masterfully shows the impact of the downfall, presenting the outcome in all its
brutality. Nobody wins in this world.
But, after sitting through Goodfellas, Casino, Gangs of New York, and tangentially, The Wolf of Wall Street, I still
wondered, why return to this well so frequently? What benefit is there to
exploring the same ground over and over? After all, isn’t there a point where the
filmmaker becomes complicit in amplifying this kind of criminality? While
Scorsese’s work has not strayed across to the wrong side of the tracks in pop
culture, where the characters he’s criticising have become their own mythological
heroes ala Tony Montana in Scarface,
it’s questionable whether the impact of how terrible these people are truly
lands with every viewer.
If I’m being completely honest, the gangster ‘genre’ is not
one that I enjoy watching. I can see that these are well made films,
brilliantly crafted and superbly acted, but I find myself rejecting their
characters completely to the point of disgust. Yes, Goodfellas is an impressive film that submerges you in Henry Hill’s
world, forcing you to watch each air bubble float up to the surface as you struggle
to hold your breath and stay alive. But, no matter the technical prowess on
display, I can’t help but finish each film with the feeling that I never want
to go through that again. I’m sure that’s sacrilege, but honesty is honesty and
not everything works for everybody.
All of this ran through my mind as I sat down for another
spin of the old gangster wheel with his long in development ageing gangster
film, The Irishman. Hand on my heart,
I can’t say I was eagerly anticipating sitting down with despicable men for
three and a half hours.
But, at the end of its exhaustive runtime, I found myself deeply
moved and now fully understanding just why Martin Scorsese would dedicate so
much of his life to telling these stories.
First of all, that runtime, it’s there to make you feel
every second of its 209 minutes. How else do you convey the feeling of getting
old? Of ageing and sitting with a life of violence and emotions? Well, you
force the audience to do exactly that. To sit with the characters actions and
supply them with moments of tedium where the feeling of years passing by washes
over you. The Irishman is never
boring, and never tiring, instead, Scorsese manages to make being a gangster
feel momentarily mundane. He leaves you feeling like the glamorous life of crims
and crooks is all for show.
In this way, The
Irishman is a curious companion film to Dragged
Across Concrete. Both are brutally violent films, but both examine their
subjects through extended moments of quiet. There’s a deliberate ode to
patience employed in both films, and to have that come across as engaging and
interesting rather than tiring and tedious is astounding.
The Irishman feels
like the culmination of everything that Scorsese has been working up to. It
feels like the full stop to a long paragraph about the history of gangsters in
For me, something has finally become clear that no doubt was
clear to everybody already: Martin Scorsese does not like these people at all.
He tells their stories as a way of exploring his own culture and history. He is an Italian-American, and no doubt grew up walking the same paths as many of the people his gangster films explore. Scorsese grew up in Little Italy, a familiar beat of Manhattan that many of these criminals called home. I’m not suggesting that if circumstances were different for Scorsese that he would have been a gangster himself, but more that as a way of exploring his own history, of reckoning with the traumas that some of the most infamous Italian-Americans inflicted on others, he has crafted a series of films that explore this history in depth. In that way, Scorsese is working to exorcise the demons of the past, to lay out what went wrong and to provide an atonement of sorts for their actions. This is less an apology, and more a mea culpa for his cultures actions.
It would be akin to me writing a piece taking account for the actions of white Australians in the past. No, I personally didn’t enact genocide against the First Nations people of Australia, but I’ve certainly been part of a heritage that has. I have sorrow and guilt over that, and due to that would like to enact some kind of reparation for my cultures historical actions. I see Scorsese’s gangster films in that same light. ‘Here are the errors of the past, let us not continue them going forward.’
Again, this may have been blatantly obvious to everyone
else, but for me, it feels like a major lightbulb moment. Martin Scorsese doesn’t
hate these people. It’s clear that he empathises with them completely,
understanding how circumstance and desire may thrust men into the life of
criminality. But, as shown in The
Irishman through searing dual performances from Lucy Gallina and Anna
Paquin as lead character Frank Sheeran’s (Robert De Niro) daughter, Peggy,
Scorsese has been watching all along, observing with a critical eye, and
through his prolonged judgement, he works to distance Italian-Americans from
the weight of the stereotypical ‘gangster’.
presents the aged mobster as a solitary figure, along in society, devoid of
everything that made them who they were. Their families and their friends have
either abandoned them or died, and as such, they find themselves without a culture
to call home. It’s quietly depressing how lonely and soul destroying a life of
violence can be, and Martin Scorsese ensures that we are going to witness and understand
every moment of it. At its conclusion, Scorsese leaves us looking back at the height
of the gangsters of America and suggests that we are now – finally – done with
these stories. The book feels closed, and for me, it feels like Scorsese has
finally reconciled with the actions of his ancestors and fellow
The Irishman is a
brilliant film, measured and wise, quiet and considered. And, for the first
time, I don’t feel like I never want to sit with these characters ever again.
Cast: Robert De
Niro, Al Pacino, Joe Pesci
Writer: Steve Zaillian, (based on the book I Heard You Paint Houses by Charles Brandt)
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.